TCS BGADrive SSD Review (64GB) – An Exclusive Look The Newest ‘Mission Critical’ TCS SSD
 

TCS BGADrive SSD Review (64GB)

An Exclusive Look The Newest 'Mission Critical' TCS SSD

 
Intel DC S3500 Data Center SSD Review (480GB x 4) – Speed, Great Features and Rock Bottom Prices
 

Intel DC S3500 Data Center SSD Review (480GB x 4)

Speed, Great Features and Rock Bottom Prices

 
Gorgeous Women of Computex 2013 – Video and Extensive Gallery
 

Gorgeous Women of Computex 2013 - Video and Extensive Gallery

 

ADATA XPG SX300 256GB mSATA SSD Review

CRYSTAL DISK INFO VER 3.9.3

Crystal Disk Info provides some excellent information about the SSD itself to include its health, product information, power on information as well as the characteristics of the SSD. We can see that the ADATA SX300 SSD is capable of TRIM as it is not greyed out as with AAM.

For our CDI portrayal, we thought it might be interesting to put the SMART data of both the ADATA XPG SX300 (left) and MyDigitalSSD (right) side by side….twins?

ATTO DISK BENCHMARK VER. 2.46

ATTO Disk Benchmark is perhaps one of the oldest benchmarks going and is definitely the main staple for manufacturer performance specifications. ATTO uses RAW or compressible data and, for our benchmarks, we use a set length of 256mb and test both the read and write performance of various transfer sizes ranging from 0.5 to 8192kb. Manufacturers prefer this method of testing as it deals with raw (compressible) data rather than random (includes incompressible data) which, although more realistic, results in lower performance results.

Initial performance results of 552MB/s read and 525MB/s write are excellent results for any mSATA SSD and right in line with manufacturers listed specifications.

CRYSTAL DISK BENCHMARK VER. 3.0 X64

Crystal Disk Benchmark is used to measure read and write performance through sampling of raw (0/1 Fill/compressible) or random data which is, for the most part, incompressible. Many new SandForce Driven SSD owners who can’t wait to test the performance of their SSD often grab this program and run a quick test, not realizing that they are testing with incompressible data rather than compressible data used in testing by manufacturers.  We have provided compressible (oFill) results on the left with incompressible (random data) results on the right.

The difference in testing with compressible versus incompressible data samples becomes evident when we put these results side by side.  The low 4k random write performance of 104MB/s is excellent and this is only the second time we have seen it from an mSATA SSD, the first being with the Mushkin Atlas mSATA 240GB SSD.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

  • mochichat

    Work on windows 8?

    • http://thessdreview.com Les@TheSSDReview

      Of course…all storage device work in recent OS releases.

  • http://twitter.com/cflorio Chris Florio

    Be aware – I bought this from Amazon and returned it and tried again…. both times, this card does NOT WORK on the Drobo 5D.

  • Thomas

    Great reviews. My question is simple, Crucial M4 256GB vs ADATA XPG SX300, what difference,if any, is there between these 2 ssd’s The m4 is 50+ dollars cheaper. Is the Adata msata drive , although better on paper, going to give me better performance on my laptop in the real world?

    • http://thessdreview.com Les@TheSSDReview

      And real-world use, you, or even an SSD expert, cannot visually tell a difference in typical day-to-day operations. Both solid-state drives would do great in your system. Both have great reputations. Unless you are looking for something specific where higher incompressible data testing is necessary, I would simply look at the price.

      • Thomas

        Thanks when you say “visually” I interpret that to be things like boot time, program opening, shutdown times etc. It is the write speed that stands out for me the Adata being in the 500mb+ per second and the m4 not breaking 300mb per second. Those numbers really mean nothing in term of real life use?

      • http://thessdreview.com Les@TheSSDReview

        Real life user in typical use yes. Unless you are transferring large incompressible files you will never be able to visually see a difference.

      • http://www.facebook.com/elysee.louis Elysée Louis

        In real world i think the m4 ssd will perform as well as the ADATA drive. ADATA drive (sandforce driven) will never reaches the announced performance. It relates only an optimal situation with compressible data.

      • http://thessdreview.com Les@TheSSDReview

        Yes but compressible data is what we see in operating systems and software and can’t be overlooked. In the typical user scenario, it would be impossible to tell the difference.

  • Thomas

    So I bought the adata sx300 256gb drive I installed it but it appears to give me only 238.5 gb is that correct? I understood from your review that this drive gives us that 7% lost space or is that not the case?

    • http://thessdreview.com Les@TheSSDReview

      That is exacty the case as shown in our report and explained.

      • Thomas

        this is what I took from your report -For those LSI SandForce lovers, it is like getting an extra 7% capacity for free. I guess what i was wondering was is 238.5 gb typical for this drive?

    • Thomas

      oK I found the available drive space in your Anvil Storage Utility snapshot 238.5 thanks.

  • RSS
  • E-Mail
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Delicious
Google+