Toshiba Q Series Pro SSD Review (256GB) – Toshiba Pushes The SSD Price Bar Even Lower

CRYSTAL DISK BENCHMARK VER. 3.0 X64

Crystal Disk Benchmark is used to measure read and write performance through sampling of highly compressible data (oFill/1Fill), or random data which is, for the most part, incompressible. Performance is virtually identical, regardless of data sample so we have included only that using random data samples:

Toshiba QPro SSD CDM

Considering the benchmark in use, we might like to have seen slightly higher write performance, especially since the same test on the M.2 client version of this SSD yielded an amazing 109MB/s in 4K random write transfer speeds.

AS SSD BENCHMARK VER 1.6

Up until recently, AS SSD was the only benchmark created specifically for SSD testing and it uses incompressible data.  AS SSD, for the most part, gives us the ‘worst case scenario’ in SSD transfer speeds because of its use of incompressible data and many enthusiasts like to AS SSD for their needs. Transfer speeds are displayed on the left with IOPS results on the right.

Toshiba QPro SSD AS SSD BenchToshiba QPro SSD AS SSD Bench IOPSA Total Score of over 1000 points is ideal for any notebook SSD.  Although not listed in specifications, 4K read IOPS of 93064 is also very good.  We tried to push this to over the 100K mark with custom testing without luck.

Toshiba QPro SSD AS SSD Copy Bench

A quick look at the AS SSD Copy Benchmark also shows some of the strongest transfer speeds and times we have seen in awhile for similar form factor SSDs. Coincidentally, this Total Score, IOPS and Copy benchmark results exceeded that of the client versions.

ANVIL STORAGE UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL (BETA)

You may not see this for long (and it’s definitely not common) but you get a freebee simply for reading! Over the last little while, we have been assisting with beta testing new benchmark software called Anvil Storage Utilities which is an absolutely amazing SSD benchmarking utility. Not only does it have a preset SSD benchmark, but also, it has included such things as endurance testing and threaded I/O read, write and mixed tests, all of which are very simple to understand and use in our benchmark testing.

Toshiba QPro SSD Anvil

PCMARK VANTAGE X64 HDD SUITE

The SSD Review uses benchmark software called PCMark Vantage x64 HDD Suite to create testing scenarios that might be used in the typical user experience. There are eight tests in all and the tests performed record the speed of data movement in MB/s to which they are then given a numerical score after all of the tests are complete. The simulations are as follows:

  • Windows Defender In Use
  • Streaming Data from storage in games such as Alan Wake which allows for massive worlds and riveting non-stop action
  • Importing digital photos into Windows Photo Gallery
  • Starting the Vista Operating System
  • Home Video editing with Movie Maker which can be very time consuming
  • Media Center which can handle video recording, time shifting and streaming from Windows media center to an extender such as XBox
  • Cataloging a music library
  • Starting applications

TOSHIBA Q SERIES PRO PCMARK VANTAGE RESULTS

The Q Series Pro pulled through PCMark Vantage testing with a Total Point Score of 66285 points and a high transfer speed of 400MB/s, while testing in Windows Media Center.  These aren’t, by any means, our strongest scores to date, and are actually significantly lower than both similar Toshiba client SSDs that had achieved 70000 points and higher.

Toshiba QPro SSD Vantage

Considering that the Q Series Pro had stronger AS SSD performance, this is a great example of why we don’t stick to one specific benchmark in our testing.   Due to the size that our Hierarchy Chart has grown to, it simply cannot accommodate scoring below 70K at this point.

25 comments

  1. blank

    what is the m.t.t.f./m.t.b.f.? what is the total drive writes per day and t.b.w.? does the controller have encryption implemented?

  2. blank

    Are you able to add a mixed Read/write test to your standard tests eg. copy folder of files from SSD to same SSD; read-modify-write data; or simultaneous runs of random read and random write. This is a worst case scenario.

  3. blank

    I’m amazed how were they able to put out such a good drive without DRAM cache 🙂

  4. blank

    les any chance this may be the BF3 controller licensed from ocz?

    • blank

      You know thats an excellent thought but would also mean that Toshiba and OCZ would have been in talks for much longer than originally believed.

      • blank

        it is just interesting that toshiba has not disclosed their controller for over a month now… why the wait? also note the huge volatility in ocz’s SP the past 4 days… looks like back and forth between the two companies. also note, OCZ Vector 150 has Toshiba’s 19nm NAND. looks like some kind of deal was struck and ocz had an injection in cash recently especially to enter a supply agreement of NAND.

      • blank

        Come work for us! Your points are VERY intriguing and the move to Toshiba memory surely plays some part in the mystery.

      • blank

        haha, ok, where do I sign up? just my DD from following OCZ and FIO for 3 years… (and losing a fortune on OCZ due to the RP mess!) my e-mail is domino54@yahoo.com

      • blank

        I’m in the boat too (FIO / OCZ )
        I’m really curious also about this “strange” controller … and now that the VECTOR 150 is out … with TOSHIBA memory ??? is there something real there ??

      • blank

        Just our speaking out loud on this one and that may in fact be the same controller…with a diff prod number, branding, firmware and performance.

      • blank

        Now that I think about it… If it’s marvel silicon it may be Everest 2.

      • blank

        les, here are my thoughts on ocz (btw) i e-mailed you back but the email address you supplied bounced back (don’t know why):
        i’ll try to do this in chronological order:
        1-ocz stated in their latest CC of a large OEM arrangement for its client side.
        2-toshiba announces Qseries SSD’s and does not disclose controller used, huh? why not?
        3-There’s been ongoing rumors regarding toshiba BO of the entire company or portion (consumer) for a range of 50-100M.
        4-ocz tanked from the 1.30 level to .40s in a matter of days w/no word from Mgmt
        5-ocz has halloween party and announces on twitter/fbook
        6-ocz releases vector 150 w/19nm NAND w/ sources stating that ocz has a nand supply agreement with toshiba.
        7-ocz has a dumb fan appreciation day with amd for BF4 tournament.
        8-panasonic/ocz rumor of licensing deal of BF3 or OEM deal (the one ocz stated in #1)

        So
        quite a lot of events! my interpretation is that toshiba BO talks are
        still ongoing and that today’s news is the OEM arrangement as discussed
        bymgmt. it would make sense for toshiba to strike a NAND supply deal
        with ocz if they knew of a large OEM deal with panasonic.. this would
        make sense given the minimal cash has left since how the heck could they
        make a NAND deal with no cash or credit?

        and with the minimal
        cash they have left they are throwing marketing events knowing they will
        be prob be bought out soon. thoughts?

      • blank

        Well thought out but th e-mail should work…

  5. blank

    So what’s your opinion, is this drive a better buy over the Samsung Evo series, comparing 2.5″ drive models, 128GB. I can’t find access time numbers for the Q Pro drive.

  6. blank

    I’ve searched many websites, but still not that many information on this Controler, except a website where it states :

    Controller: Toshiba-Optimized Controller

  7. blank
    Luiz Rogério de Carvalho Neto

    Hi, Les! I have this exact same SSD (Toshiba Q Series Pro 256gb), but i’m a bit worried about the Write speeds i’m getting here.
    I’ve followed all steps you mentioned in the SSD optimization guide for windows 8, everything seems to be running ok. But when I run CrystalDiskMark my write speeds are terrible (like 5 to 60x lower than yours), the read speeds, otherwise, are almost the same you got and even a bit higher.
    Any suggestion of what could be causing it? I’m on a fresh install of windows 8.1 pro x64 on a Dell Latitude 3540 laptop (core i7 4500u processor).

    Thanks in advance for the great review and very useful optimization guide for ssds! 😀

    • blank
      Luiz Rogério de Carvalho Neto

      I tried checking the “enable write caching on the device” option (I had it unchecked because the optimization guide told to do so :P), and then tested the ssd again, for my surprise I got the same speed results as you, just with this change!
      Then I tested two more times (enabling and disabling it) and the results were consistent, slow with it disabled and fast with it enabled.

      Here is the result with the option unchecked:
      https://imageshack.com/a/img23/8691/7hu8.png

      And with the option checked:
      https://imageshack.com/a/img34/3232/4svx.png

      Any thoughts of why does this happen?

      • blank

        I wouldnt change the caching option. Thimgs to consider…
        1. Was it a fresh install or migration?
        2. In power settings, are you on performance or the highest?

      • blank
        Luiz Rogério de Carvalho Neto

        This is a fresh install, just installed windows 8, updated to 8.1 and followed the optimization guide right after. And the power option is set to “high performance”.
        Is leaving the caching option checked that bad?
        Everything else is set to what the optimization guide tells, even checked if the trim was working with the tool provided, and it is ok.

      • blank

        The only thing I can suggest is to join the forums and post some benchmarks so we can take a closer look. I am very concerned with what we see in performance in regular mode, vice that of safe mode. If there is a significant difference, we know that it is software related.

      • blank
        Luiz Rogério de Carvalho Neto

        I just read the section of the optimization guide about the write caching, and i guess i got it wrong.

        in this image:

        https://www.thessdreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Buffer-Flushing.png

        which checkbox should i check? only the first one, only the second one, both or none?

  8. blank

    Im planning of upgrading my toshiba satellite l735 hdd to q series pro ssd. My question is, can i install it myself using only the guide(im a complete novice) or do i really need to hire a technician? Also, is the ssd all i need to purchase? I mean, does it have the same size as the hdd or would a need a converter or something? Btw, thanks for the awesome review!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *