<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Silicon Power Velox V20 60GB SATA 2 SSD Review &#8211; Using A Different Flavor In NAND Flash Memory	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-10280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=30306#comment-10280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-10279&quot;&gt;R Armstrong&lt;/a&gt;.

That review was done in 2011 so, most sedfinitely, they may have gone with a different run of internal components.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-10279">R Armstrong</a>.</p>
<p>That review was done in 2011 so, most sedfinitely, they may have gone with a different run of internal components.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: R Armstrong		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-10279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=30306#comment-10279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The version of the Silicon Power Velox V20 60GB reviewed here looks very different then the versions being sold currently. Is this an older version? I have also located versions with a different marking that includes a serial number. That version uses a Micron memory device. Any ideas what gives here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version of the Silicon Power Velox V20 60GB reviewed here looks very different then the versions being sold currently. Is this an older version? I have also located versions with a different marking that includes a serial number. That version uses a Micron memory device. Any ideas what gives here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-8363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=30306#comment-8363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-8359&quot;&gt;Gebmartins&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes it states 32nm chips.  Tx for the input!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-8359">Gebmartins</a>.</p>
<p>Yes it states 32nm chips.  Tx for the input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gebmartins		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/silicon-power-velox-v20-60gb-sata-2-ssd-review-using-a-different-flavor-in-nand-flash-memory/#comment-8359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gebmartins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=30306#comment-8359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[these are 32nm NAND chips. We are yet to see 26nm Hynix NAND, with 64gbits chips, NAND prices need more competiors.
Can&#039;t wait for 15nm NAND that Hynis promised for 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are 32nm NAND chips. We are yet to see 26nm Hynix NAND, with 64gbits chips, NAND prices need more competiors.<br />
Can&#8217;t wait for 15nm NAND that Hynis promised for 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
